Language-model similarity
A small open model compares the passage with patterns learned from human and AI-generated text.
Free · private · no sign-up
Check whether a passage contains patterns often associated with AI-generated text. Get one clear 0–100 score, passage-level signals, and honest limits—without uploading your writing.
✓Your text stays in this browser. The model downloads to your device; the draft is not uploaded or saved.
Read the score carefully
The free AI checker compares the writing with patterns learned from both human and generated text. It also looks at rhythm and repetition. The final number describes similarity—not who wrote it.
Fewer learned AI-writing patterns appear in the sample.
The detector sees competing or inconclusive evidence.
Several patterns resemble generated writing.
Strong similarity—but still not proof of authorship.
What this free AI detector checks
The result combines a compact language model with simple writing-pattern checks. That makes the score easier to inspect, but it cannot replace source history or human judgment.
A small open model compares the passage with patterns learned from human and AI-generated text.
Sentence-length changes and structural variation add context to the model reading.
The strongest passages are surfaced so you can review the writing instead of trusting one opaque number.
Built for a careful first pass
An AI content detector can misread polished human work, heavily edited AI text, translations, formulaic academic writing, or very short samples. Use the result to ask better questions—not to make automatic accusations.
Questions, answered
Yes. The text detector is free to use, requires no account, and does not charge for checks. The compact detection model runs in your browser.
No. The page downloads the detection model and analyzes the text locally in your browser. Your draft is not sent to UltraHumanizer or written to its database.
No. AI text detectors can produce false positives and false negatives, especially with short, edited, technical, or multilingual writing. A score should guide review, not prove authorship.
For a more useful reading, paste at least 80 words. Longer samples give the detector more rhythm, repetition, and phrasing patterns to compare.