The comparison
You want one Google-sign-in workspace with paid inputs up to 12,000 words, separate tone and length controls, protected terms, editable output, and visible source comparison.
Paste your text and compare the changes.
Checking your account and recovering the draft…
Your humanized text will appear here.
Your available word allowance and input limit are shown in the editor. Continue to the feature comparison ↓
UltraHumanizer offers complete-document capacity on paid plans, exact-term protection, and visible editing controls. UnAIMyText.com may suit repeated short-form Standard rewrites because it advertises 450 words per anonymous input and no stated total cap; its Ultra mode, files, and full settings require Pro.
This page is published by UltraHumanizer. Product descriptions are based on public information; they are not an independent performance benchmark. Explore our API or browser extension.
The 30-second answer
It keeps the workflow focused on readable, natural output while protecting the central meaning of your draft.
Try it free ↗Compare the capabilities that matter to your workflow. Pricing and included features may change, so confirm the current terms before paying.
Compare the features ↓Feature-by-feature
Public product information reviewed through September 16, 2026. We separate vendor claims from independently verified outcomes.
Swipe horizontally to compare →
| Feature |  UltraHumanizer | UnAIMyText |
|---|---|---|
| Free starting access | Free plan; paid plans from $8/month | 450 words per input as a visitor; 500 with a free account; no total free cap is advertised |
| Document size | 500 words on Free; 1,000 to 12,000 on paid plans | 450 anonymous, 500 free-account, 1,000 Basic, or 2,000 Pro words per input |
| Rewrite controls | Tone, output length, reading level, rewrite strength, and exact terms | Standard or Ultra plus language, formality, emotional tone, creativity, context, intent, and other settings by plan |
| Revision workflow | Editable result, quick refinements, and visible source-versus-result changes | Saved history for account users and individual sentence rephrasing on paid access |
| Document upload | Document upload is available; the plan input limit still applies | PDF and DOCX upload are listed with Pro; Basic explicitly excludes document uploads |
| Detection workflow | Separate AI text, image, and voice detector tools | The company publishes vendor-run tests against GPTZero, Turnitin, and Copyleaks; no detector is presented inside the core .com editor |
| Language documentation | Key pages are localized, including Korean; check the editor for your writing language | Reviewed pages gave different descriptions of supported languages |
| Privacy clarity | Uploads are processed for the requested result; sensitive material should still be removed | Policy says anonymous text is discarded, but the same page set does not fully explain retention for saved account history |
| Paid pricing | Free plan; paid plans from $8/month | The reviewed plans listed Basic at $9.99/month and a promotional Pro price of $14.99/month; verify current checkout terms |
| Best fit | Long-form, editing-first work with preservation controls | Repeated short free runs or paid users who value Ultra and published detector-test methodology |
Based on public product information available when this comparison was written. Features and prices can change; check current terms before choosing a plan. Vendor performance claims are not independent guarantees.
How we compare
What can a new user do before creating an account or paying?
We compare input limits, controls, revision steps, and setup friction.
Detection, history, API access, and analysis matter for some workflows.
Official pages support feature facts; vendor performance claims are not treated as independent tests.
Decision scenarios
Disclosure: These are illustrative workflow scenarios, not customer testimonials or performance test results.
Needs one coherent workspace, exact-term protection, and visible source-versus-result changes across thousands of words.
Works in sub-450-word sections and prefers unlimited anonymous Standard runs without creating an account.
Values published methodology but will treat vendor-run pass rates as claims and verify current dates, settings, facts, and policy requirements.
FAQs
UltraHumanizer offers paid long-document capacity, direct editing controls, exact-term protection, and visible change review. UnAIMyText may suit repeated short Standard-mode runs when its advertised anonymous input allowance fits the workflow.
Yes. UnAIMyText.com currently advertises up to 450 words per visitor input with no account, no card, and no total usage cap. A free account raises the input to 500 words and adds history.
The reviewed official pages list Basic at $9.99 per month for 30,000 words and Pro at a promotional $14.99 per month for 100,000 words, 2,000-word inputs, Ultra mode, uploads, and all settings. Verify the live checkout.
Its homepage says more than 30 languages, while its features page names eight and lists two variants as upcoming. Because the official descriptions conflict, verify your exact language in the live editor before purchasing.
No. Its website publishes company-run test results, while its own terms say it does not guarantee permanent undetectability. Detector models change and can misclassify both human and AI-assisted writing.
Your own draft is the most useful test
